Tuesday, July 17, 2012




MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT THOUGHTS ABOUT FRIENDS


In fits and starts I have been writing my memoirs in hope that my grandchildren and their grandchildren will know more about my life and times than I know about the lives of my forbears. I’m not sure why I think it is important that I do this, but my kids think it’s important, so I tell myself I’m doing it for them.

I made a list of the people about whom I wanted to say something in this immortal tome I am giving birth to. A few are in the rich and famous category. Name dropping is one of my favorite ego trips.

But most of the people whose friendship has enriched my life are neither rich nor famous. They made their bucks the hard way and spend them carefully. Their names have never been a household word in more than a handful of households other than their own.

And mine.

There are a lot of them! I was surprised, because I tend to encase myself in an invisible barrier and don’t let many people really in. I’m not sure I really like you and I’m pretty sure you won’t really like me if you get too close.

My list of very-important-people-you-never-heard-of runs nearly two pages single spaced. Some of us go waaay back. Some have crossed the great divide, many are still around and we touch base now and then. A few are new and I won’t live long enough for them to become “old friends”, but their newness doesn’t diminish their dearness. I doubt that it occurs to any of them that I am sitting in my cluttered little cave at 2:00 a.m. thinking about them.

But I am.

I talked to one of those old friends today, one with whom I once spent more time than with my own family, shared some hairy moments and some hilarious ones. When either of us had a problem we couldn’t get on top of, or a happiness we couldn’t wait to tell, we got hold of each other ASAP. That half hour phone conversation across a continent cast a bright glow onto my day that’s still there. I hope it hangs around for a while.

Of course there are degrees of friendship, of closeness and intimacy and sharing and compatibility. You never feel exactly the same about any two friends, like you never feel exactly the same about any of your children.

But I can make an accurate generalization about all of them.

They know me.

The verb “to know” is not about a cognitive awareness, like I know today is Tuesday. Not to get too indelicate here, the Hebrew verb “to know” was a 15th century bible translator’s euphemism for sexual intercourse.

That kind of knowing means nothing important is hidden, it’s a kind of non-physical intimate interaction characterized by open sharing of each other’s basic humanness. My friends know me and love me and let me know it, let me feel it. They love me despite the unlovely things they know about me.

With them I can be myself. Well, within limits. Sometimes I can’t stand to be myself around myself.

No pretense. No fakeness. No trying to impress. No carefully chosen words or shaded meanings to avoid offense. With those who know me, offense is taken only when offense is intended. No cautious guarding against being hurt. It is not unbreakable, but it is tough. Even when there is tension between us we know it will not likely be permanent, or fatal. I give them me and they give me themselves, and with this we are content.

What freedom!

I miss them when I am not with them. I miss their honest “I don’t know” when I am surrounded by those who have all the answers and give them out, bidden or not. I miss them when I have to hang around people in a polite, conforming, shallow nothingness.

Even when we are apart, we are not really separated. When we make contact again we take up where we left off, with no awkwardness, no dancing around to find new feelings which may have cropped up between us.

This column has gone more slowly than usual, writing time was interspersed with remembering time.

It’s time to hit the send button. The glow is still there.

©2012 Jack Wilson      


Thursday, May 3, 2012

Up From Bedlam


This was previously published in several other venues, and is posted here in May, which is designated “National Mental Health Month”

                                                                              Up From Bedlam

“Bedlam” is the name of a London suburb where, in 1247, compassionate monks established a place for the care of people with mental disorders. The “care” provided for the unfortunate wretches sounds more like torture. Some “patients” were chained to the walls, some in iron cages, others wandered free to act out their delusions, hallucinations, and violent self-destructive behavior. But Bedlam was progress. It was a first, a new concept, a place intended for some kind of protection and care for mentally ill persons.

About 1948 I accepted an invitation to visit the Missouri State Hospital for the Insane. It was the most mind-searing, gut-wrenching, spirit-gagging experience of my young life.

About 25 men lethargically pushed dirty mops in a continuous circle across a warped and splintered wooden floor. Their eyes were vacant, their faces expressionless. Some of them were drooling, one man‘s sexual arousal was obvious but ignored, now and then one of them would laugh mirthlessly at some secret inner-minded humor. The one stubble-faced attendant, in filthy white clothes, chain smoked and lounged impassively as his custodial charges marched their purposeless, endless treadmill of mindless desperation. They were more suggestive of inmates than patients.

The ambience in the female area was different only in gender. There was no circular floor mopping, but each of the patients was supposedly occupied in some useful activity. One skinny, pale-faced type approached me with an explicit sexual proposition stated loudly in colorful street vernacular. In the laundry room a cheerful, heavily perspiring fortyish woman stuffed grungy gray bed clothes into a tub of tepid water which matched the color of the sheets. I thought she was an employee.

In times past psychiatric hospitals were sometimes referred to as “Snake Pits”. That is defamatory to snakes. I got a dose of reality that day which has never left me.

Move forward a decade.

With a newly minted doctoral degree in my hand, I reported to the Kansas City Psychiatric Receiving Center for clinical training. The ambience was strikingly different from the ones I just described.

The common room was bright, cheerfully furnished, no gender segregation for most patients. There were a few semi-zombieized patients who were being moved “up” from more restricted levels of care, but most of them were sort of doing their own thing. A few women were knitting with blunt brittle plastic “needles“ which they had to check in and out when they wanted to use them, a few were playing cards or checkers, one man was doing a chess solo. A couple of patients were pacing, driven by inner demons, but disruptive behavior was infrequent. Two female nurses and two or three male Psych Techs were actively involved with the patients, distributing meds, answering questions, or just chatting.

Psychiatrist John O’Hearne gave me an orientation tour; the solo chess player came over to talk. His name was Don. About 40 years old, clean-shaven, neatly dressed, with an educated vocabulary and an easy manner. Dr. O’Hearne told me he was a high school principal. When I asked about his diagnosis, John said cryptically, “Wait a few days”. About a week later Don was in a “rubber room”, stark naked and filthy from his own feces, talking in staccato gibberish about his plans for world reform. A year later he was still in the hospital, having his cyclic battles with his inner demons. Terrible waste! As other medications became available I hope he was able to resume somewhere some semblance of his former life.

Now move ahead thirty more years, another city, another hospital, another man. A clinical psychologist, a professional with four university degrees, he was in the grip of a major depression.

Even doctors get sick. (his symptoms appeared in adolescence, but no one recognized them). At 2 o’clock one morning he was sitting at his desk, ripping pages from his typewriter because he couldn’t write a coherent paragraph. The next morning his wife and his secretary each took him by an arm, walked him firmly to the car, and delivered him to a psychiatric hospital.

The first night he crawled on his hands and knees in the bathroom, afraid the staff would find some pills he had spilled, pills with which he had been medicating himself and smuggled in. The treatment he received was excellent, highly professional, effective. After a month in the hospital, 6 months off work recovering at home, medication (which he will gratefully take for the rest of his life) monitored by a very good psychiatrist, an understanding, supportive boss, and a wife who is a shoo-in for sainthood, he is back doing his thing, doing well.

I was that man.

That was 27 years ago, a third of my total lifetime. That was the birth of 5 great-grandchildren ago. That was a quarter of a million miles of travel in 20 countries ago. 27 busy, active, years I would have missed had there not been some caring, competent people to pick me up when I crashed, some skilled professionals and some incredible pharmaceuticals. Years I would have missed if some people had not been struggling for 700 years to bring mental health care up from Bedlam.

Had I been born a few centuries, a few generations earlier, I would certainly have worn Bedlam’s chains, or mopped a floor, or shared Don’s cyclic nightmare in the rubber room.

Mental illness has always afflicted human beings. Many of its victims made significant contributions of great benefit to society.

Martin Luther was about a quart low on Lithium when he had hallucinations so severe he threw an inkwell at the Devil. Abraham Lincoln suffered from awful depressions that occasionally led to thoughts of suicide. Vincent Van Gogh cut off his own ear. Michelangelo, Isaac Newton, Charles Dickens, Ernest Hemingway, Winston Churchill, Mike Wallace; all certifiably mentally ill. Have you seen the movie, A Beautiful Mind, about Nobel laureate John Nash, whose quantum leaps in mathematics were accomplished despite his rampaging schizophrenia?

Progress is being made. Bedlam is history. Psychiatry and psychology have made remarkable gains in understanding and treatment. But there is a long way to go. Mental illness is still stigmatized. Public attitudes are way behind the realities of modern treatment.

We are not crazy, or insane, we are sick.

Sick like you who have diabetes or migraine headaches or ulcers or problems with any other part of your physical equipment that doesn’t work like it should. You take medicine routinely so you can function effectively. So do we. But we are treated differently than other sick persons.

Insurance companies usually pay a percentage of the cost of mental health care. Not long ago my primary care physician wanted me to have a series of tests. 
My wife and I are fortunate to have excellent health insurance coverage, which is simply too expensive for many people. Probably most people.The hospital and physicians bills looked like a page out of the national debt, but didn’t cost us a nickel out-of-pocket. But on my quarterly check-up visit to my friendly shrink, the same insurance company pays only 50% of the cost, which is about the price of a tank of gas or a meal for two at a mediocre restaurant. Go figure.

This year, about 168,000 Coloradans are, or will become, mentally ill. (That’s a terrible term, but I don’t know what else to call it). Disorders of their body chemistry, which are known, understood, and treatable by methods which exist in this state. About 40% will be unable to get treatment. The majority of these will get worse, their illness progressing until they are disabled or homeless. A few will commit suicide.

And it’s all so unnecessary. But so are a lot of sad things in life. Whining doesn’t help, or complaining, or thinking there is nothing to be done. There is plenty to be done. Some of it you can do. And what we do will make a difference. We must simply keep whacking away at this particular piece of “outrageous fortune”.

I am very glad some people, long ago, thought there had to be something better than Bedlam.

© 2012 Jack Wilson


Sunday, April 15, 2012

In Praise of Atheism


                                                     IN PRAISE OF ATHEISM

My friend calls himself an atheist, I’m a Christian. Of course neither of us “are” those things, the words are just labels, handy handles employed to reveal a snippet about one dimension of our selves to anyone who might be interested.

He and I enjoy each other’s company and share many interests. He’s bright, articulate, has a quick mind and a mostly upright character, certainly as upright as mine.

Conventional expectations might assume that we hold radically different, incompatible, antithetical beliefs and spiritual values. Not so! The fact is we are more together on such matters than many who carry either of the two labels are with each other.

“Atheist” and “Christian” are both widely misunderstood and incorrectly used words. Even among those who apply the labels to themselves there is not unanimity about what the words mean.

In the first century C.E. Christians in the Roman Empire were considered atheists because they did not believe in or worship the correct deity, the Roman Emperor. Both “Christian” and “Atheist” carry a lot of historical and cultural baggage.

Some self-identified atheists interpret the word to mean not-a-theist, that is, a person who does not attribute human-like characteristics to a deity. Belief in god is OK, non-theists just can’t believe He is a he, or keeps a 24 hour day, get tired, changes his mind, walks to-and-fro, or experiences emotions like love and anger, as does the god of the Hebrew bible.

Lots of atheists don’t categorically deny that god or gods exist, they simply have not found persuasive reason to believe it.

The kind of atheists who really rattle Christian’s cages are the aggressively outspoken ones whose core, bedrock belief is that there is not, anywhere in any form, never has been and never can be, a deity. Atheism is their religion; to positively deny that god exists is their core article of faith.

Atheists of this variety can be passionately evangelical; they aggressively pursue efforts to persuade others. Indeed there are those who speak of the Gospel of atheism, Gospel meaning Good News, like 18th century French philosopher Denis Diderot who earnestly declared, "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest".

OK – so? Is atheism a terrible thing, a danger to right thinking and a well-ordered civil society?

Atheism, as all other “isms”, is simply an opinion. It’s not what somebody is, it’s where that somebody is at a particular moment along the road of life. They may not be at exactly the same place tomorrow.

Atheists are not my enemy, or God’s. They simply are, as we all are, incomplete finite human creatures, blessed and burdened with a brain that asks questions and must find some answers, even if the answers are inaccurate or partial or put them at odds with the prevailing beliefs of their society.

Most atheists I know have open, searching minds and are far less dogmatic and absolute than their counterparts among the Theists. And they make a habit of being courteous. They rarely clang around denouncing religion or dramatically challenging God to smite them if he exists.

Atheists and Christians come in a variety of flavors. I prefer some flavors of atheism to some flavors of Christian.
©2012 Jack Wilson